First out of the box and first to the woodshed: The University of Phoenix Annual Academic Report

This week one of the giants of higher education, and especially higher education for adults, the University of Phoenix, released its inaugural “Annual Academic Report.” The report covered student satisfaction ratings, scores on the Measurement of Academic Proficiency and Progress (MAPP), the Standardized Assessment of Information Literacy Skills (SAILS) and financial information. The university stated that the report was a “transparent look at a variety of ways in which the University of Phoenix measures itself in relation to its Mission.” I have written previously in this blog about an effort by a number of institutions serving adults at a distance called Transparency by Design. We are collecting data in 2008 and plan to report our findings in early 2009. The University of Phoenix is not a member of Transparency by Design, but many elements contained in the Transparency by Design program are reported in the University of Phoenix’s report.

The report generated attention from the Chronicle of Higher Education on June 5th and by June 6th. The critics were out in force. See:

http://chronicle.com/daily/2008/06/3115n.htm?utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

http://chronicle.com/news/article/4625/u-of-phoenixs-report-on-students-progress-is-disingenuous-critic-says?utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

http://insidehighered.com/news/2008/06/06/phoenix

Several things appear evident:

First, the University of Phoenix should be commended for attempting to be transparent … for taking a positive step toward accountability.

Second, even when we try to do the right thing, we will be criticized by those who constantly claim we have not done enough or there are better ways to be accountable.

Third, when an institution reports only on its own students and on its own data, the critics are even more harsh and question validity, motivation and more.

Transparency and accountability are very important to prospective adult students and to those who care about higher education for adults. The efforts of the University of Phoenix and Transparency by Design will improve over time and must be seen as first steps toward a greater outcome. Transparency by Design will address some of the criticisms made of the University of Phoenix report in that multiple institutions will use a common format to address critical elements of institutional performance, and that will allow for comparison of one institution to another. But, rest assured that there will be no shortage of critics.

But criticism is expected and accepted when we are trying to innovate in the area of being more accountable and transparent. Just as the University of Phoenix has been criticized, so will Transparency by Design. But we will prevail because accountability and transparency are long overdue. It won’t be perfect at the outset, but we are going to keep working on it and we will all be the better for it.

Mike

Share This

One Response to “First out of the box and first to the woodshed: The University of Phoenix Annual Academic Report”

David Martin Says:

I have read some of the criticism against University of Phoenix, and some of it appears justified. UoP, while trying to appear transparent, appears to have manipulated the MAPP scores by not revealing if the freshmen the measured were the same students measured as seniors. It is a widely known fact that there is a significant amount of students who tranfer in in the sophomore year. That UoP did not include the qualifiers of there measurement may appear manipulative to some.

Most of UoP’s problems as an on-line university do not necessarily stem from the transparancy issue, but rather their business model. Many people, both in and out of academia (including myself), fault UoP for it’s seemingly over-emphasis on growth. I sincerely believe that most of UoPs difficulties stem from there emphasis on growth and revenue over ensuring quality of education above all.

This is one of Capella’s great strengths. I am approaching the comprehensive evalation portion of my Capella Ph.D. program and have attended two of the three residency track. To date, my overall experience has been VERY positive. Capella (more than any University or College I have attended) understands that the value of their brand is a very high quality education – at all levels. I have worked very hard in the program, but I am not complaining at all, because I believe it is this demand for excellence is what sets Capella apart from many other Universities – both on-line and traditional.

But in the end, I agree with Dr. Offerman. We must be prepared to accept and evaluate criticism and learn from it. Sometimes it can be very valuable, however, if our lessons are learned from the mistakes and missteps of others.

Dave Martin, Capella Ph.D. Learner and
UoP Graduate, MSCIS (Class of 2005)

Leave a Reply

Let us know what you think. All comments will be reviewed prior to going live. Comments that are profane or obscene, or unrelated to the topic of the post will not be published.

About

Welcome to The Other 85 Percent. So what does "the other 85 percent" refer to? Research has shown that only about 15 percent of higher education students still fit the traditional definition of young adults age 18 to 22 who live on campus and go to school full time. more

Author
Michael J. Offerman, EdD
Michael J. Offerman, EdD
Vice Chairman,
Capella University

READ BIO

Archives
Links
Subscribe to this blog
Close
E-mail It