The SAT and ACT exams have long been used in admissions by land-based colleges and universities. However, Inside Higher Ed reports that this is changing. The National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC), in a major shift, is encouraging colleges to “consider dropping the SAT or ACT as admission requirements.” The news report states that a special NACAC panel concluded that “colleges have been placing more emphasis on testing despite evidence that they should be moving in the opposite direction. Generally, the commission supports the position that high school grades in pre-college courses are the best way to predict college success.” The report goes on to say that there are concerns that the tests are not equally valid for all groups of people and may limit minority enrollments. Along that line, the article cites some examples of colleges that dropped the tests or made them optional and subsequently realized more applications, in general, and more from female and minority students, in particular. What NACAC proposes instead of the tests is a move to “a highly personalized look at applications.”
This topic interests me because as an adult educator, I have heard questions and criticisms about why these tests were not used for admissions. The fact is that one of the groups that these tests don’t serve well is adults. The tests are designed and validated with high school students. The tests have been shown to have little predictive value for adults. Yet, the questions persist about why the tests are not used for adult admissions. So, it is gratifying to see that NACAC and the highly selective colleges mentioned in the news report are taking this stand.
But, if the solution is to rely on pre-college courses, that does not help adult students. Many adults who want to earn a college degree did not have the opportunity to take pre-college courses. And, even if they did, the fact that they did or did not do well in a pre-college course taken ten, twelve, twenty years ago is not really all that helpful in making an admission decision.
Instead, what adult-serving institutions have done and will continue to do is to recognize that there are no easily available predictors of college success for adult applicants. Instead, we must use the suggested “highly personalized” assessments to guide our admissions decisions. We must understand the applicant’s high school or prior college success, or lack thereof, but mitigate that information with what has intervened in the years since. We need to look at work, family, community and other experience. We need to assess whether maturity or other intervening factors weigh in favor of or against admission. This is not easy work.
Nonetheless, this is important work. Extending opportunity to adults who want to learn and earn a degree. It is comforting to know that the higher education mainstream is moving in our direction, confirming what we have known and been doing for many years.
Your thoughts? I look forward to reading your comments.
Mike
Share ThisMike Offerman Says:
Camay, thanks for taking time to share your thoughts on this. Provisional admission is a useful tool and something to be seriously considered as we deal with the issue of how to make admissions decisions.
Mike
Camay Norville Says:
Thanks mike for your response. After, doing some research on provisional acceptance for various schools, I’ve learned that students are required to pay out of pocket for tuition. So, again this will place many individuals at an disadvantage. I am extremely interested in the final results of this matter. Thanks
Thomas S. Stein MBA Says:
As a focal point for education initiation they should be used. Literacy is a valid question.
A more important and revolutionary point of view is in dispatching the LSAT exams. Any nation which in any way precludes total participation in their government to a limited number of people is not only a free state but one opening a door to violent revolution. Government must be open to all the people all the time. Plumbers and mathematicians alike must have free access to every branch of government. The present LSAT restricts this to an elitist few and must be changed.
Any attempt to limit participation in government, be it by violence or testing is treason by any name. Should the extent of capability testing restrict participation beyond communication standards in every day practice then a Constitutional Convention should be drawn to investigate, rectify, and punish such nonsense. A four year apprenticeship and training program should be utility enough for formal entrance into higher education and competence for the judiciary as well. If this privileged looting by exclusion is a standard which is desired, then the purveyors of governance should be held responsible, not the citizen. Artificial restrictions on numbers of participants in any bar are pure and simplistic forms of monopoly for which severe personnel punishment and not tolerance need to prevail! The citizenry make value through their representations against a limiting Constitution of mandatory rules, and in such reliance establish the only academic accreditation. Simple humans with labored self-worth are advised to take note of such restrictions in such unstable times!
Let us know what you think. All comments will be reviewed prior to going live. Comments that are profane or obscene, or unrelated to the topic of the post will not be published.
Welcome to The Other 85 Percent. So what does "the other 85 percent" refer to? Research has shown that only about 15 percent of higher education students still fit the traditional definition of young adults age 18 to 22 who live on campus and go to school full time. more
Camay Norville Says:
Interesting points. I again with some but disagree with others.
I believe the SAT testing should be a requirement depending on the applicants high school. Sadly, many public schools fail to prepare students for SAT testing, let alone college level courses. Next, there are some academic focused public schools and private schools that actually prepare students for the next leve. Therefore, SAT scores would probaly be a fair determinant.Lastly, taking a look at other determining factors would be very benefical but there is a huge gap of adults who lack prestigious and professional/community service experiences due to lack of credentials. So there have to be a median. I have noticed some university that honor provisional admission until a student proves themselves academically.
November 1st, 2008 at 10:24 pm