The Effect of the Economy on Online Learning

Recently the annual survey of online learning was released by the Sloan Consortium. The report shows continued growth in demand for online offerings despite the expectation of many, including the report’s authors, that demand would slow.

Institutions responding to the survey indicated that they believe current economic challenges will have a positive impact on overall online enrollments.  That remains to be seen.

Since so many online enrollments are by adult and other part-time, working students, I wonder what will happen to these students as the economic impact becomes more obvious.  An economic downturn of the current magnitude can have different impacts at different institutions and not always in the ways expected.  In some cases, when the economy turns down, there are budget cuts at universities and colleges that actually reduce access for adults and part-time, working adults.  It depends on how a college or university is structured and how online or external degrees are funded.  If the revenues go into some type of general fund and are not necessarily available to the program, then expansion or even continuation of programs can be threatened.  On the other hand, if the degree programs are offered by a unit that is able to retain tuition revenues, then there is the possibility that the programs will continue and even expand.  But even in those cases there may be pressure to treat these programs as “cash cows” to help ride out reductions in other funding sources. 

And cuts are certainly on the way, especially in public institutions.  This Inside Higher Ed article has examples from two of our largest states.  Particular attention should be given to the possibility of the California State University System reducing enrollments by 10,000 students.  It would seem to be politically risky for the system to cut 10,000 traditional students and expand programs for “non-traditional” students.  So, it might be assumed that there will be reduced access in that system.  While New York is calling for budget cuts and reductions in aid on an average student basis, it may also see reduced access.   Add to this the recent story out of the University of Iowa that faculty are being limited in the number of online courses they may teach and the pressures on online programs begin to multiply.

There are at least two interesting elements to the Sloan Consortium’s report.  First, they explain that the earliest pioneers in online learning began such offerings little over a decade ago and only 15% of all U.S. colleges and universities had offered online courses prior to 1999.  They go on to say that the growth of online enrollments in 2008 is not because of growth in the number of institutions offering online courses and programs but because of growth at the early pioneer institutions.  These institutions offer the greatest array of offerings and account for most of the growth.  A second issue the Sloan report addresses is the importance of geography.  They report that over 85% of all online enrollments come from within 50 miles of the campus of the college or university offering the online programs.  The author’s conclude that offering online courses does not necessarily expand the geographic reach of a college or university, but speculate that those schools that succeed in widening their reach may grow faster than others.

I suspect that these two issues may be connected, and the growth of those who serve beyond a 50 mile radius is likely to be happening already.  That the pioneer online institutions have long worked to offer their programs nationally and to develop brands that were recognized beyond their immediate region.  That most other schools find it challenging to market and brand themselves nationally.  And that this is why the majority of growth is produced by the pioneers.

But what is troubling to me is that, even when states are cutting support for public colleges and universities, there is a growing demand for workforce education, and there is continually increasing demand for online programs, there are still states with public policies that inhibit that access.  Some of the same states that are facing the most severe economic stress have some of the most restrictive policies for out-of-state institutions that seek to offer online programs within those states.  It is the adult-serving online programs that can help address increasing demand even in times of economic downturn.  We know how to serve adults, today’s workforce, and how to deliver online programs across the country.

There is a need for public policy rationality, for states to figure out how to work with adult, online programs that are offered across state borders.  And, where state policies might include the idea of protecting in-state institution, there is a need to recognize that those very institutions may be facing diminished capacities to meet the increasing demands of adult and other part-time, working students in these states.

Please let me know what you think.

Mike

Share This

5 Responses to “The Effect of the Economy on Online Learning”

David Goodrich Says:

Do you have any legislative pitfall specifics that you might be able to mention in regards to the state of Michigan where I am from? I found this post to be fascinating by the way especially as I myself live in a state that is experiencing such economic devastation and as I pursue a career in instructional design for online learning.

Keith Hampson Says:

Couldn’t agree more, Mike.
Two points to add . . .
First, the policies that inhibit students taking courses out of state with online providers is clearly not focussed on the best interests of the student (to get more education) or even the longer term interests of the state (to have an educated citizenry). It serves, instead, the states who see enrollment in their own institutions as a source of revenue (i.e. keep the money in the family). This is understandable, though short-sighted. And this desire to keep money from flowing over state lines may grow as the impact of the economic slowdown is felt more deeply.
Second, the relatively rapid growth of the larger pioneer online providers will likely continue. Volume provides these institutions with economies of scale (allowing sufficient investment; keeping prices down) and a critical mass of intellectual capital (doing it well). All things remaining constant, I see these providers capturing a greater total share of students – but for all the right reasons: they do it well, and efficiently.

Mike Offerman Says:

David, Michigan is not one of the states that I would identify as a problem state. While there are some recent changes there to make licensing of some professionals more difficult by requiring that those professionals received their degree from a university that has specialized accreditation, the ability to offer online programs in Michigan is not as restricted as it is in some other states. That is a very good thing because we all realize the “economic devastation” that you cite.

Thanks for your comment and question.

Mike

Mike Offerman Says:

Hi Keith, thanks for sharing your two points. The points are well made. Appreciate your comments.

Mike

Greg Jensen Says:

Hi Mike,

I started writing a blog a few days ago to discuss Human Capital Management. I am currently looking for opportunities in HR/and or higher Education administration.

An area that I chose to discuss, blends very nicely with your article.
You may find the brief blog here: http://the4p-process.blogspot.com/2009/01/continuing-and-higher-education-shelter.html, with a link to a great report written by the American Association of School Administrators. This article is entitled: Report of Findings: Impact of the Economic Downturn on Schools

Respectfully,

Greg Jensen

Leave a Reply

Let us know what you think. All comments will be reviewed prior to going live. Comments that are profane or obscene, or unrelated to the topic of the post will not be published.

About

Welcome to The Other 85 Percent. So what does "the other 85 percent" refer to? Research has shown that only about 15 percent of higher education students still fit the traditional definition of young adults age 18 to 22 who live on campus and go to school full time. more

Author
Michael J. Offerman, EdD
Michael J. Offerman, EdD
Interim President,
Capella University

READ BIO

Archives
Links
Subscribe to this blog
Close
E-mail It