Over the last few months, various public colleges and universities have announced that they are restricting enrollment due to financial reasons. One example is the University of California institutions. See this LA Times article for a story about how it is more difficult to get into the UC institutions this fall. And, the more restrictive admissions are not limited to California. As this editorial illustrates, Washington is facing the same situation. Yakima Valley Community College President Linda Kaminski is quoted as saying “its really the end of access.”
These admissions restrictions come at a time when there are multiple calls for increased access and, more importantly, attainment rates in order for states and our country to remain economically competitive. While the LA Times article quotes the University of California spokesperson as saying no qualified applicant will go without admission to the UC, it just may not be at the campus they wanted, the fact is that California needs to increase its capacity to produce graduates, not merely hold its own. That is brought home in an article about a shortage of college graduates in California. The shortage is so substantial that by 2025 California is projected to have a shortage of 1 million college graduates.
So, what is the answer to all of this? As I have noted before, increasing access and attainment rates requires a broader view than merely looking at traditionally-aged students and public colleges and universities. It will require more attention to helping adults earn degrees. And, it seems reasonable for states and the nation to leverage the private colleges and universities that can help increase attainment rates to supplement the production of public institutions. Especially those institutions that use technology to deliver education at a distance to adult students. A wise state would be one that removes barriers for these institutions to provide programs to its citizens. For a relatively low investment, these out-of-state institutions can help increase attainment rates and achieve a better economy. Unfortunately, states sometimes take the opposite approach and make it difficult for the adult serving, online colleges and universities to operate within the state. That seems very short-sighted.
Your thoughts? Please leave a comment.
Mike
Share ThisMike Offerman Says:
Kelly, thanks for taking time to post your comment. And congratulations on your achievements in balancing life and education.
Mike
Let us know what you think. All comments will be reviewed prior to going live. Comments that are profane or obscene, or unrelated to the topic of the post will not be published.
Welcome to The Other 85 Percent. So what does "the other 85 percent" refer to? Research has shown that only about 15 percent of higher education students still fit the traditional definition of young adults age 18 to 22 who live on campus and go to school full time. more
Kelly Says:
Higher ed in this country really needs a complete overhaul — everything from admissions policies to how it’s financed to what’s expected of people once they get there. While physical barriers to entry need to be removed so that more non-traditional students (like me) can participate, we probably could use a few more academic barriers to entry.
If someone who isn’t really college material and wouldn’t be able to finish a degree in 4 years of full-time study gets instead sent to trade school or community college, that should not be viewed as a failure. We still need electricians, mechanics, and dental assistants (and those jobs can never be outsourced to India).
What is a crime is having classrooms filled with unprepared students who have taken on thousands in debt that will follow them for many years after they’ve left school without a degree, while academically qualified, non-traditional students are shut out just because they can’t attend full-time classes on a physical campus. This situation is improving (I’m a 42-year-old senior at Excelsior College) but it still has a long way to go.
June 5th, 2009 at 11:04 am