<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to best package higher education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theother85percent.com/2009/10/how-to-best-package-higher-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theother85percent.com/2009/10/how-to-best-package-higher-education/</link>
	<description>Working adults and the new world of higher education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:48:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Offerman</title>
		<link>http://www.theother85percent.com/2009/10/how-to-best-package-higher-education/comment-page-1/#comment-17198</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Offerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theother85percent.com/?p=208#comment-17198</guid>
		<description>Adrian, thanks for your comments.  I certainly agree that there is a need for breadth as well as depth in what is learned and that a liberal education is a noble goal.  But, I also think there is lots of redundancy in what we ultimately provide or expect in our educational programs.  It would be nice not to have to &quot;learn&quot; the same things over and over.  

But, I suspect that the biggest barrier to accepting a modular or more granular approach has a lot to do with the back-office systems we have put together that are built on the assumptions that education occurs in 1-3 or more credit courses and the fact that folks just don&#039;t like change.  It takes a good deal of courage to try something that challenges the entire higher education establishment that is built on a very fixed way of doing things.  But, it is also fun, interesting and often quite liberating.  So, I hope we can keep poking at this idea and see if there might actually be a way to do things better, even if differently.  

Thanks again, 

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian, thanks for your comments.  I certainly agree that there is a need for breadth as well as depth in what is learned and that a liberal education is a noble goal.  But, I also think there is lots of redundancy in what we ultimately provide or expect in our educational programs.  It would be nice not to have to &#8220;learn&#8221; the same things over and over.  </p>
<p>But, I suspect that the biggest barrier to accepting a modular or more granular approach has a lot to do with the back-office systems we have put together that are built on the assumptions that education occurs in 1-3 or more credit courses and the fact that folks just don&#8217;t like change.  It takes a good deal of courage to try something that challenges the entire higher education establishment that is built on a very fixed way of doing things.  But, it is also fun, interesting and often quite liberating.  So, I hope we can keep poking at this idea and see if there might actually be a way to do things better, even if differently.  </p>
<p>Thanks again, </p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.theother85percent.com/2009/10/how-to-best-package-higher-education/comment-page-1/#comment-17058</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theother85percent.com/?p=208#comment-17058</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about modular learning as well. A faculty member at my community college suggested this approach for science courses and was promptly shut down. I don&#039;t fully understand the the reasons why it is so unpopular, but think you shed some light here. Oversight and assessment are not trivial concerns.

Personally, I would love to have the option to skip parts of learning that I find redundant or dabble in others to explore an area of interest, however I suspect there would be some negative consequences. The result of a la carte education might be overspecialization and an &quot;educated&quot; population that has no foundation in classical subjects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about modular learning as well. A faculty member at my community college suggested this approach for science courses and was promptly shut down. I don&#8217;t fully understand the the reasons why it is so unpopular, but think you shed some light here. Oversight and assessment are not trivial concerns.</p>
<p>Personally, I would love to have the option to skip parts of learning that I find redundant or dabble in others to explore an area of interest, however I suspect there would be some negative consequences. The result of a la carte education might be overspecialization and an &#8220;educated&#8221; population that has no foundation in classical subjects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Offerman</title>
		<link>http://www.theother85percent.com/2009/10/how-to-best-package-higher-education/comment-page-1/#comment-15039</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Offerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theother85percent.com/?p=208#comment-15039</guid>
		<description>Paul, thanks for taking the time to comment.  Let us know if you examine the Kellogg program.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, thanks for taking the time to comment.  Let us know if you examine the Kellogg program.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Speck</title>
		<link>http://www.theother85percent.com/2009/10/how-to-best-package-higher-education/comment-page-1/#comment-15002</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Speck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theother85percent.com/?p=208#comment-15002</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting point of view and one that I would be glad to have more discussion in.  Openness to new and innovative ideas will at least get us some good debate.  I have included a video my K-12 school produced illustrating a direction we would like to go highlighting the points expressed in the wonderful book, Disrupting Class.  Although t isn&#039;t higher ed, I hope it illustrates a point of openness.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IynNGev7tVU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting point of view and one that I would be glad to have more discussion in.  Openness to new and innovative ideas will at least get us some good debate.  I have included a video my K-12 school produced illustrating a direction we would like to go highlighting the points expressed in the wonderful book, Disrupting Class.  Although t isn&#8217;t higher ed, I hope it illustrates a point of openness.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IynNGev7tVU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IynNGev7tVU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.theother85percent.com/2009/10/how-to-best-package-higher-education/comment-page-1/#comment-14978</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theother85percent.com/?p=208#comment-14978</guid>
		<description>I think this is an interesting development, and it offers an opportunity for those with degrees to add to their skill set in a measurable way. It also extends the utility of our education system opens some real opportunities for implementing more technology in learning. I think you are right to voice concern over the management of such structures if they became commonplace. We don&#039;t want higher education to turn into a sort or merit badge-like process where students create their own lists and then check the boxes off. I think a gradual process toward a hybrid model is the most likely and desirable track for this.

As far as my own personal interest is concerned, I&#039;ll have to look at Kellogg&#039;s program to see if I would find it useful. I could see how it might be useful in some of the sciences, particularly specific topic areas in mathematics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is an interesting development, and it offers an opportunity for those with degrees to add to their skill set in a measurable way. It also extends the utility of our education system opens some real opportunities for implementing more technology in learning. I think you are right to voice concern over the management of such structures if they became commonplace. We don&#8217;t want higher education to turn into a sort or merit badge-like process where students create their own lists and then check the boxes off. I think a gradual process toward a hybrid model is the most likely and desirable track for this.</p>
<p>As far as my own personal interest is concerned, I&#8217;ll have to look at Kellogg&#8217;s program to see if I would find it useful. I could see how it might be useful in some of the sciences, particularly specific topic areas in mathematics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

